NutritionalSupplements.com
Site Navigation
 JUMP TO NutritionalSupplements.com LIVE -- Real-Time Discussion Forum
Your Favorite Supplements at the Lowest Prices

Site Search

Nortesten


Cell-Tech Info

Acetabolan Info

More On Nortesten

More On MuscleTech






Consumer Review: The Anotesten/Nortesten Stack Is Effective, But Not Worth The Price Of Over $150.
A month ago I purchased the Anotesten-Nortesten stack by MuscleTech. The Nortesten, 112 capsules, a months supply, ran me $67.00. The Anotesten ran me $90.00 for 168 caps. There is a lot of hype that I have read on the internet and in MuscleMag saying that this stack will give steroid like results by Nortesten mimicking the effects of 200 Mg of Deca-Durabolin a week and Anotesten is supposed to raise testosterone levels significantly. I had very high expectations not to mention I paid a lot of money. I was ready to start.

I began taking the stack just like it recommends on the bottle which is 2 Nortesten in the morning and 2 in the evening and 4-6 Anotesten around 12 noon. Nortesten is supposed to be taken for 4 straight weeks while Anotesten is 2 weeks on 1 week off. I didn't feel any different throughout the stack like some might think, but it was effective in building muscle and strength. My bench went up a few reps every workout and my max jumped 15 pounds in the 4 weeks. I also gained about 8 pounds which is not fat.

There is some psychological benefit from the hype of these supplements which seemed to make my workouts and my pump more intense than usual. Some side effects that I experienced were increased appetite and a little bit more oily skin than usual . However, it didn't lead to acne of any sort. I think that the Anotesten-Nortesten stack is effective, but not worth the price of over $150. I also believe that the hype of "steroid like" results is irrational. Overall, I recommend the stack to anybody who can spare the extra money. If not, I would stick to creatine.

Ryan C.


Response #1
Thanks for the info on the nor/andro stack. Certainly seems expensive. Creatine only pumps me up when I'm on it. Do you think the nor or straight andro is more effective if taken separately (for building muscle)? Let me know your thoughts.


Response #2
Take andro by itself. I think it works better than creatine at giving good pumps and gaining strength. I took a bottle of andro and had great workouts, and also gained quite a bit of strength. This was a good stepping stone in gaining size over my next few months.

Warren


Response #3
I don't know what up with the andro y'all have been taking. I tried andro poppers and another andro product. I made some decent gains, but I also gained some fatty tissue around my pecs. Now I'm to scared to try the real juice.


Response #4
You should expect incredible results from taking these two supplements. If your bench jumped 15 pounds, that is pretty good gains. When they say that it has the same effects as 2ccs of deca, people expect to look like Arnold in a month. The truth is 200 milligrams a week of deca is not that much. It will give you solid gains, but not overnight. You have to give them more than a cycle to work.


Submit a Review or Question

New reviews or questions may be submitted instantly on our realtime discussion forum, NutritionalSupplements.com LIVE. Click here to register and post your review or question.

Nutritional Supplements | Weight Training | Equipment
Home | Site Search | Submit a Review or Question | About the Site | Advertising Information | Links | NutritionalSupplements.com LIVE

Copyright © 1998-2009 NutritionalSupplements.com. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer